M. O. , C. Goodwillie, R. H. Ree, R. D. Sargent, M. J. Gren et al., NESCent), a center funded by the National Science Foundation. We thank the other members of the working group, Waller for helpful discussion and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada) for financial sup

S. J. Arnold, Constraints on phenotypic evolution, American Naturalist, vol.140, pp.85-107, 1992.

E. G. Bakker, E. A. Stahl, C. Toomajian, M. Nordborg, M. Kreitman et al., Distribution of genetic variation within and among local populations of Arabidopsis thaliana over its species range, Molecular Ecology, vol.15, pp.1405-1418, 2006.

S. C. Barrett, The evolution of plant sexual diversity, Nature Reviews Genetics, vol.3, pp.274-284, 2002.

M. W. Blows and R. Brooks, Measuring nonlinear selection, American Naturalist, vol.162, pp.815-820, 2003.

D. Charlesworth, Evolution of plant breeding systems, Current Biology, vol.16, pp.726-735, 2006.

D. Charlesworth and B. Charlesworth, Quantitative genetics in plants: the effect of the breeding system on genetic variability, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol.18, pp.911-920, 1987.

D. Charlesworth, M. T. Morgan, and B. Charlesworth, Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage, Evolution, vol.44, pp.1469-1489, 1990.

P. Cheptou, Allee effect and self-fertilization in hermaphrodites: reproductive assurance in demographically stable populations, Evolution, vol.58, pp.2613-2621, 2004.

C. G. Eckert, Contributions of autogamy and geitonogamy to self-fertilization in a mass-flowering, clonal plant, Ecology, vol.81, pp.532-542, 2000.

L. Fishman, Pollen discounting and the evolution of selfing in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae), Evolution, vol.54, pp.1558-1565, 2000.

C. K. Ghalambor, D. N. Reznick, and J. A. Walker, Constraints on adaptive evolution: the functional trade-off between reproduction and fast-start swimming performance in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata), American Naturalist, vol.164, pp.38-50, 2004.

C. Goodwillie, S. Kalisz, and C. G. Eckert, The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence, Evolution and Systematics, vol.36, pp.47-79, 2005.

V. Grant, The regulation of recombination in plants, Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, vol.23, pp.337-363, 1958.

L. D. Harder and J. D. Thomson, Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal-pollinated plants, American Naturalist, vol.133, pp.323-344, 1989.

L. D. Harder and W. G. Wilson, A clarification of pollen discounting and its joint effects with inbreeding depression on mating system evolution, American Naturalist, vol.152, pp.684-695, 1998.

L. D. Harder, S. C. Barrett, and W. W. Cole, The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol.267, pp.315-320, 2000.

L. D. Harder, S. A. Richards, and M. B. Routley, Effects of reproductive compensation, gamete discounting and reproductive assurance on mating-system diversity in hermaphrodites, Evolution, vol.62, pp.157-172, 2008.

C. R. Herlihy and C. G. Eckert, Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant, Nature, vol.416, pp.320-323, 2002.

K. E. Holsinger, Inbreeding depression doesn't matter: the genetic basis of mating system evolution, Evolution, vol.42, pp.1235-1244, 1988.

K. E. Holsinger and J. D. Thomson, Pollen discounting in Erythronium grandiflorum: mass-action estimates from pollen transfer dynamics, American Naturalist, vol.144, pp.799-812, 1994.

K. E. Holsinger, M. W. Feldman, and F. B. Christiansen, The evolution of self-fertilization in plants: a population genetic model, American Naturalist, vol.124, pp.446-453, 1984.

B. Igic, L. Bohs, and J. R. Kohn, Historical inferences from the self-incompatibility locus, New Phytologist, vol.161, pp.97-105, 2004.

P. K. Ingvarsson, A metapopulation perspective on genetic diversity and differentiation in partially self-fertilizing plants, Evolution, vol.56, pp.2368-2373, 2002.

S. K. Jain, The evolution of inbreeding in plants, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol.7, pp.469-495, 1976.

J. Jersakova and S. D. Johnson, Protandry promotes male pollination success in a moth-pollinated orchid, Functional Ecology, vol.21, pp.496-504, 2007.

M. O. Johnston, Evolution of intermediate selfing rates in plants: pollination ecology versus deleterious mutations, Genetica, vol.103, pp.267-278, 1998.

J. D. Karron, R. J. Mitchell, K. G. Holmquist, J. M. Bell, and B. Funk, The influence of floral display size on selfing rates in Mimulus ringens, Heredity, vol.92, pp.242-248, 2004.

J. G. Kingsolver, H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri et al., The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations, American Naturalist, vol.157, pp.245-261, 2001.

J. R. Kohn and S. C. Barrett, Pollen discounting and the spread of a selfing variant in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata: evidence from experimental populations, Evolution, vol.48, pp.1576-1594, 1994.

A. S. Kondrashov, Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. II. Facultative apomixis and selfing, Genetics, vol.111, pp.635-653, 1985.

R. Lande and D. W. Schemske, The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models, Evolution, vol.39, pp.24-40, 1985.

D. G. Lloyd, Self-fertilization and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization, International Journal of Plant Sciences, vol.113, pp.370-380, 1979.

M. Lynch, B. Walsh, . Sinauer, M. A. Sunderland, M. Lynch et al., Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations, American Naturalist, vol.146, pp.489-518, 1995.

M. Smith, J. , R. Burian, S. Kauffman, P. Alberch et al., Developmental constraints and evolution: a perspective from the Mountain Lake Conference on Development and Evolution, Quarterly Review of Biology, vol.60, pp.265-287, 1985.

N. Perrin and J. Travis, On the use of constraints in evolutionary biology and some allergic reactions to them, Functional Ecology, vol.6, pp.361-363, 1992.

E. Porcher and R. Lande, The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression under pollen discounting and pollen limitation, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol.18, pp.673-684, 2005.

M. C. Rademaker and T. J. Jong, Effects of flower number on estimated pollen transfer in natural populations of three hermaphroditic species: an experiment with fluorescent dye, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol.11, pp.623-641, 1998.

D. W. Schemske and R. Lande, The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations, Evolution, vol.39, pp.41-52, 1985.

D. J. Schoen, M. O. Johnston, A. -m.-l'heureux, and J. V. Marsolais, Evolutionary history of the mating system in Amsinckia (Boraginaceae), vol.51, pp.1090-1099, 1997.

G. L. Stebbins, Self-fertilization and population variability in the higher plants, American Naturalist, vol.91, pp.337-354, 1957.

N. Takebayashi and P. Morrell, Is self-fertilization a dead end? revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach, American Journal of Botany, vol.88, pp.1143-1150, 2001.

M. K. Uyenoyama and D. M. Waller, Coevolution of selffertilization and inbreeding depression. I. Mutation-selection balance at one and two loci, Theoretical Population Biology, vol.40, pp.14-46, 1991.

M. K. Uyenoyama, K. E. Holsinger, and D. M. Waller, Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization, Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, vol.9, pp.327-381, 1993.

M. Kleunen and K. Ritland, Predicting evolution of floral traits associated with mating system in a natural plant population, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol.17, pp.1389-1399, 2004.

C. F. Williams, Effects of floral display size and biparental inbreeding on outcrossing rates in Delphinium barbeyi (Ranunculaceae), American Journal of Botany, vol.94, pp.1696-1705, 2007.

R. Wyatt, Selection for traits such as clonal reproduction can favor stable intermediate levels of self-fertilization. Shown here: Iris versicolor in Nova Scotia. Right, Partial self-fertilization is expected to be optimal in many species because flowers serve several functions, and the selfing rate cannot be adjusted independently of them. Shown here: Rhododendron canadense in Nova Scotia, Pages 109-131 in, 1988.