D. Charlesworth, M. T. Morgan, and B. Charlesworth, Inbreeding depression, genetic 1 load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage, Evolution, vol.2, pp.1469-1489, 1990.

D. Charlesworth and J. H. Willis, The genetics of inbreeding depression, Nat. Rev, 2009.

. Genet, , vol.10, pp.783-796

P. Cheptou and A. Mathias, Can varying inbreeding depression select for intermediary 6 selfing rates?, Am. Nat, vol.157, pp.361-373, 2001.

L. Chittka, J. D. Thomson, and N. M. Waser, Flower constancy, insect psychology, and 8 plant evolution, Naturwissenschaften, vol.86, pp.361-377, 1999.

J. E. Cresswell, How and why do nectar-foraging bumblebees initiate movements between 10 inflorescences of wild bergamot Monarda fistulosa (Lamiaceae, Oecologia, vol.82, pp.450-460, 1990.

J. E. Cresswell, Models of pollinator mediated gene dispersal in plants, Ecology and Evolution of flowers, 2006.

C. R. Darwin, The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom, John, vol.14, 1876.

L. Murray,

D. Jong, T. J. , P. G. Klinkhamer, and M. J. Vanstaalduinen, The consequences of 16 pollination biology for selection of mass or extended blooming, Functional Ecology, vol.6, pp.606-615, 1992.

D. Jong, T. J. , N. M. Waser, and P. G. Klinkhamer, Geitonogamy: the neglected side of 18 selfing, Trends Ecol. Evol, vol.8, pp.321-325, 1993.

C. Devaux and R. Lande, Selection on variance in flowering time within and among 20 individuals, Evolution, vol.64, pp.1311-1320, 2010.

C. Devaux, C. Lepers, and E. Porcher, Constraints imposed by pollinator behaviour on 22 the ecology and evolution of plant mating systems, J. Evol. Biol, 2014.

Y. W. Duan, Y. P. He, and J. Q. Liu, Reproductive ecology of the, 2005.

, endemic Gentiana straminea (Gentianaceae), a hermaphrodite perennial characterized by 2 herkogamy and dichogamy, Acta Oecol.-Int. J. Ecol, vol.27, pp.225-232

C. G. Eckert, Contributions of autogamy and geitonogamy to self-fertilization in a mass-4 flowering, clonal plant, Ecology, vol.81, pp.532-542, 2000.

C. G. Eckert, S. Kalisz, M. A. Geber, R. Sargent, E. Elle et al.,

J. K. Johnston, D. A. Kelly, E. Moeller, R. H. Porcher, M. Ree et al., Plant mating systems in a changing world, Trends Ecol. Evol, vol.25, pp.35-43, 2010.

J. A. Elzinga, A. Atlan, A. Biere, L. Gigord, A. E. Weis et al., Time after 9 time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions, Trends Ecol. Evol, vol.22, pp.432-439, 2007.

L. F. Galloway, T. Cirigliano, and K. Gremski, The contribution of display size and 11 dichogamy to potential geitonogamy in Campanula americana, Int. J. Plant Sci, vol.163, pp.133-139, 2002.

M. A. Geber, The relationship of plant size to self-pollination in Mertensia ciliata, Ecology, vol.13, pp.762-772, 1985.

C. Goodwillie, S. Kalisz, and C. G. Eckert, The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating 15 systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence, Annu. Rev. Ecol, 2005.

, Evol. S, vol.36, pp.47-79

D. Goulson, S. A. Hawson, and J. C. Stout, Foraging bumblebees avoid flowers already 18 visited by conspecifics or by other bumblebee species, Anim. Behav, vol.55, pp.199-206, 1998.

J. M. Grindeland, N. Sletvold, and R. A. Ims, Effects of floral display size and plant 20 density on pollinator visitation rate in a natural population of Digitalis purpurea, Funct. Ecol, vol.21, pp.383-390, 2005.

M. O. Johnston, Natural selection on floral traits in two species of Lobelia with different 1 pollinators, Evolution, vol.45, pp.1468-1479, 1991.

M. O. Johnston, E. Porcher, P. Cheptou, C. G. Eckert, E. Elle et al.,

D. A. Kelly, M. Moeller, A. A. Vallejo-marin, and . Winn, Correlations among fertility 4 components can maintain mixed mating in plants, Am. Nat, vol.173, pp.1-11, 2009.

M. O. Johnston and D. J. Schoen, Mutation rates and dominance levels of genes affecting 6 total fitness in two Angiosperm species, Science, vol.267, pp.226-229, 1995.

C. Y. Jordan and S. P. Otto, Functional pleiotropy and mating system evolution in plants: 8 frequency-independent mating, Evolution, vol.66, pp.957-972, 2012.

J. D. Karron, K. G. Holmquist, R. J. Flanagan, and R. J. Mitchell, Pollinator visitation 10 patterns strongly influence among-flower variation in selfing rate, Annals of Botany, vol.103, pp.1379-1390, 2009.

J. D. Karron, R. J. Mitchell, K. G. Holmquist, J. M. Bell, and B. Funk, The influence of 13 floral display size on selfing rates in Mimulus ringens, Heredity, vol.92, pp.242-248, 2004.

P. M. Kittelson and J. L. Maron, Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in the 15 perennial yellow bush lupine, Lupinus arboreus (Fabaceae), Am. J. Bot, vol.87, pp.652-660, 2000.

T. M. Knight, J. A. Steets, J. C. Vamosi, S. J. Mazer, M. Burd et al., , p.17

M. O. Johnston, R. J. Mitchell, and T. L. Ashman, Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: 18 pattern and process, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S, vol.36, pp.467-497, 2005.

A. S. Kondrashov, Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. 2. Facultative apomixis 20 and selfing, Genetics, vol.111, pp.635-653, 1985.

R. Lande, Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution, Evolution, vol.22, pp.314-334, 1976.

R. Lande and D. W. Schemske, The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding 1 depression in plants. 1. Genetic models, Evolution, vol.39, pp.24-40, 1985.

R. Lande, D. W. Schemske, and S. T. Schultz, High inbreeding depression, selective 3 interference among loci, and the threshold selfing rate for purging recessive lethal mutations, 1994.

, Evolution, vol.48, pp.965-978

C. Leclerc-potvin and K. Ritland, Modes of self-fertilization in Mimulus guttatus 6 (Scrophulariaceae): a field experiment, Am. J. Bot, vol.81, pp.199-205, 1994.

D. A. Levin and W. W. Anderson, Competition for pollinators between simultaneously 8 flowering species, Am. Nat, vol.104, pp.455-467, 1970.

D. G. Lloyd, Self-fertilization and cross-fertilization in plants. 2. The selection of self-10 fertilization, Int. J. Plant Sci, vol.153, pp.370-380, 1992.

D. G. Lloyd, Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in 12 plants, Am. Nat, vol.113, pp.67-79, 1979.

D. G. Lloyd and D. J. Schoen, Self-fertilization and cross-fertilization in plants. 1. 14 Functional dimensions, Int. J. Plant Sci, vol.153, pp.358-369, 1992.

S. J. Mazer, The quantitative genetics of life history and fitness components in Raphanus 16, 1987.

L. , Brassicaceae): ecological and evolutionary consequences of seed-weight 17 variation, Am. Nat, vol.130, pp.891-914

R. J. Mitchell, J. D. Karron, K. G. Holmquist, and J. M. Bell, The influence of Mimulus 19 ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns, Funct. Ecol, vol.18, pp.116-124, 2004.

D. A. Moeller, Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators, Ecology, vol.21, pp.3289-3301, 2004.

J. P. Mojica and J. K. Kelly, Viability selection prior to trait expression is an essential 1 component of natural selection, Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci, vol.277, pp.2945-2950, 2010.

M. T. Morgan, D. J. Schoen, and T. M. Bataillon, The evolution of self-fertilization in 3 perennials, Am. Nat, vol.150, pp.618-638, 1997.

P. O'neil, Natural selection on genetically correlated phenological characters in Lythrum 5 salicaria L. (Lythraceae), Evolution, vol.51, pp.267-274, 1997.

K. Ohashi and T. Yahara, How long to stay on, and how often to visit a flowering plant? 7 A model for foraging strategy when floral displays vary in size, Oikos, vol.86, pp.386-392, 1999.

E. Porcher, J. K. Kelly, P. Cheptou, C. G. Eckert, M. O. Johnston et al., The 9 genetic consequences of fluctuating inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant selfing 10 rates, J. Evol. Biol, vol.22, pp.708-717, 2009.

E. Porcher and R. Lande, Evaluating a simple approximation to modeling the joint 12 evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression, Evolution, vol.67, pp.3628-3635, 2013.

E. Porcher and R. Lande, The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression 14 under pollen discounting and pollen limitation, J. Evol. Biol, vol.18, pp.497-508, 2005.

M. C. Rademaker, T. J. De-jong, and E. Van-der-meijden, Selfing rates in natural 16 populations of Echium vulgare: a combined empirical and model approach, Functional Ecology, vol.17, pp.828-837, 1999.

B. Rathcke, Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination, pp.305-329, 1983.

. Real, Pollination Biology

A. W. Robertson, The relationship between floral display size, pollen carryover and 21 geitonogamy in Myosotis colensoi (Kirk) Macbride (Boraginaceae), Biol. J. Linnean Soc, vol.22, pp.333-349, 1992.

A. W. Robertson and M. R. Macnair, The effects of floral display size on pollinator 1 service to individual flowers of Myosotis and Mimulus, Oikos, vol.72, pp.106-114, 1995.

D. W. Schemske, Breeding system and habitat effects on fitness components in three 3 neotropical Costus (Zingiberaceae), Evolution, vol.37, pp.523-539, 1983.

D. W. Schemske, Flowering phenology and seed set in Claytonia virginica 5 (Portulacaceae), Bull Torrey Bot Club, vol.104, pp.254-263, 1977.

D. W. Schemske and R. Lande, The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding 7 depression in plants. 2. Empirical observations, Evolution, vol.39, pp.41-52, 1985.

J. Schmitt, Density-dependent pollinator foraging, flowering phenology, and temporal 9 pollen dispersal patterns in Linanthus bicolor, Evolution, vol.37, pp.1247-1257, 1983.

D. J. Schoen and D. G. Lloyd, Self-fertilization and cross-fertilization in plants, vol.3, 1992.

, Methods for studying modes and functional aspects of self-fertilization, Int. J. Plant Sci, vol.12, pp.381-393

M. J. Simmons and J. F. Crow, Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations, 1977.

, Annu. Rev. Genet, vol.11, pp.49-78

A. A. Snow, T. P. Spira, R. Simpson, and R. A. Klips, The ecology of geitonogamous 16 pollination, Floral Biology. Studies on 17 floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants, pp.191-216, 1996.

J. C. Stout and D. Goulson, The use of conspecific and interspecific scent marks by 19 foraging bumblebees and honeybees, Anim. Behav, vol.62, pp.183-189, 2001.

M. K. Uyenoyama, K. E. Holsinger, and D. M. Waller, Ecological and genetic factors 21 directing the evolution of self-fertilization, Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, vol.9, pp.327-381, 1993.

N. M. Waser, Comparative pollen and dye transfer by pollinators of Delphinium nelsonii, 1988.

, Funct. Ecol, vol.2, pp.41-48

N. M. Waser, L. Chittka, M. V. Price, N. M. Williams, and J. Ollerton, Generalization in 3 pollination systems, and why it matters, Ecology, vol.77, pp.1043-1060, 1996.

A. A. Winn, E. Elle, S. Kalisz, P. Cheptou, C. G. Eckert et al.,

A. Moeller, R. H. Ree, R. D. Sargent, and M. Vallejo-marin, Analysis of inbreeding 6 depression in mixed-mating plants provides evidence for selective interference and stable mixed 7 mating, Evolution, vol.65, pp.3339-3359, 2011.

S. Wright, Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol.2, 1969.

T. Yahara, Graphical analysis of mating system evolution in plants, Evolution, vol.46, pp.557-561, 1992.

T. P. Young and C. K. Augspurger, Ecology and evolution of long-lived semelparous 12 plants, Trends Ecol. Evol, vol.6, pp.285-289, 1991.